DNA testing is unassailable, we are told. Not so. For starters the reliability of DNA testing relies on the method of testing used, so an unreliable method can be used an accepted at face value in court. Moreso, though, DNA is basicall hearsay. See Zain and Gilchrist, both of whom sent men to their death by testifying in court that these men were guilty of crimes they were innocent of. Zain was basically a fraud, Gilchrist a hate-filled ideologue.
I have been readin "Enemy Combatant" by Moazzam Begg. The CIA tried to recruit him, he says. Said they look after their own. Not like MI5, I hope. Look at what happened to Marty McGartland. They became convinced that he was a liability so they told the IRA that he was a mole for them and for Special Branch. Special Branch weren't in on it. The MI5/IRA arrangement is well know. From the start of the troubles there was an agreement that MI5 would leave alone the IRA leadership and the IRA wouldn't go after the royal family. They were friendly with each other and both sides wanted McGartland dead, at least after MI5 had let on to the IRA that he was a spy. The IRA grabbed McGartland and dragged him off to a tower block to kill him. He survived, albeit with several bullets in him having gone out the window of the tower block and fallen all the way to the ground. His mates in Special Branch got him onto witness protection in Tyneside but MI5 told the local police he was a paedophile and a terrorist and they started harrassing him. He ended up with more IRA bullets in him, but still survived. Best not to be looked after like that.
Why did the business plot against FDR fail? Plenty of similar plots succeeded. The obvious answer is that they approached the wrong man when they approached Smedley Butler. Who's David Sharp? Name just came into my head. Perhaps FDR really was set up to keep out the Kingfish. The plot against him went perfectly. Perhaps that was the idea. Give FDR street-cred by making out that he's the enemy of fascists everywhere, rather than their willing tool. In other words the plot was never intended to fail, hence their approach to this known "anti-war General". Perhaps the motive were even more sinister than the gaining of prestige for FDR, although I don't know what they might have been.
I find this on the interweb:
In 1966, more than thirty years after General Smedley Butler, anotherI, like all conspiracy theorists, like linking things together. Like the six degrees of Bergerac in the Tao of Bergerac on the Radio. Hence, I see links between "The Underworld" by Graham Hancock, the first File of CRIM-RAM by Branton and the following website: Mother and daughter in Malta. The Hypogeum of Hal Saflienti. Branton tells us about secretary, later involved with a UFO organisation, who saw a hairy beasty in a massive subterranean canyon. And there's the missing school-children, of course. I've just finished reading "Mysteries of Ancient South America" by Harold Wilkins, having so often seen the likes of Kolosimo and Childress cite it.
former Marine Commandant, General David Sharp, offered this remarkable
statement:
"I believe that if we had and would keep our dirty, bloody,
dollar-soaked fingers out of the business of these nations so full of depressed,
exploited people, they will arrive at a solution of their own.... And if
unfortunately their revolution must be of the violent type because the "haves"
refuse to share with the "have-nots" by any peaceful method, at least what they
get will be their own, and not the American style, which they don't want and
above all don't want crammed down their throats by Americans."
I once dialled 888 on a telephone, why doesn't really need going into, but someone answered. I can't remember who or anything the like, though. Sorry. I just don't think anyone should have answered. It was a BT landline, incidentally. Google is characteristically unhelpful.
Kosovo. Interesting intervention. The beacon of humanitarianism, if you believe that. Of course it has nothing to do with it that the Kosovo Liberation Army, those champions of the oppressed, control a major heroin pipeline, as it has nothing to do with the fall of the Taleban that they had just instituted an effective ban on opium production. Nothing at all. My previous conclusion that the invasion of Kosovo was to implement an electoral system based on Proportional Representation may have been mistaken. I'm inclined to think it was all about the drugs, as most things are. Gary Webb. So on.
Nice and cool at this time in the morning, but that's enough for now.
No comments:
Post a Comment