Friday, 30 May 2008
Thursday, 22 May 2008
A girl called Bex I've discovered, sits around in public talkuing loudly in an entirely unselfaware manner. Talking about her abortions, her STDs, how drunk she got, who used to masturbate in class at her school. I've said before that one of the things which sperates man from beast is the conscious control of the tongue.
If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.
-- James 1:26
And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.
-- James 3:6
Want to be a good Christian? Shut up! Think before you speak! Don't rant on in a public place about you STDs and so forth. Speak only for meaningful and necessary communication. Try not to speak at all.
A dog can't stop itself barking because it's just a reflex machine. A human is meant to be better than that.
Also there was a documentary on the Channel 4 the other day. About the local English fundamentalists, not particularly interesting, but one piece sticks in my mind. A Tory MP, female, former nurse (a certain Tory Peer recently announced that nurses are dirty, drunken whores), wearing a very fetching white dress holding some sort of press conference flanked by several silent male Tory MPs. Something veneration-of-the-goddess-y about it.
The City of London police came under fire two years ago when it emerged that more than 20 officers, ranging from constable to chief superintendent, had accepted gifts worth thousands of pounds from the Church of Scientology.
The City of London Chief Superintendent, Kevin Hurley, praised Scientology for "raising the spiritual wealth of society" during the opening of its headquarters in 2006.
Writing on an anti-Scientology website, the teenager facing court said: "I brought a sign to the May 10th protest that said: 'Scientology is not a religion, it is a dangerous cult.'
"'Within five minutes of arriving I was told by a member of the police that I was not allowed to use that word, and that the final decision would be made by the inspector."
A policewoman later read him section five of the Public Order Act and "strongly advised" him to remove the sign. The section prohibits signs which have representations or words which are threatening, abusive or insulting.
The teenager refused to back down, quoting a 1984 high court ruling from Mr Justice Latey, in which he described the Church of Scientology as a "cult" which was "corrupt, sinister and dangerous".
After the exchange, a policewoman handed him a court summons and removed his sign.
Saturday, 17 May 2008
Wednesday, 14 May 2008
Tuesday, 13 May 2008
Cheney served as a Congressman from Wyoming from 1979 to 1989. This was during a time when two major page scandals, both involving Republican members of Congress, rocked Capitol Hill. They were the Koreagate scandal and the page/prostitutes visiting the White House in the late 1980s. In 1981, Lynne Cheney wrote "Sisters," an Old West novel containing lesbian themes. Dick Cheney's close friend and former chief of staff Scooter Libby penned a novel called "The Apprentice." The following is an excerpt from Libby's book, which features its main character, Yukiko, drawing hair on the 'mound' of a little girl: "At age 10 the madam put the child in a cage with a bear trained to couple with young girls so the girls would be frigid and not fall in love with their patrons. They fed her through the bars and aroused the bear with a stick when it seemed to lose interest."
Monday, 12 May 2008
Friday, 9 May 2008
Many things are claimed to have changed. Such is the narrative structure of this theatrical event. The laws of physics, for one day only, took a new form. The elementary principles of justice, well, that's an altogether more thoroughgoing and long lasting change.
What these two things have in common is that they are unchangeable. Justice and true science are no respecters of person. It is the enemies of these concepts who seek to corrupt them, to replace them with different ideological constructs under the name of the old.
This is no starting point, but these are things we can be sure of. That makes this a good place to start an investigation. If things really didn't change on "9/11" then two areas of interest arise: 1) the continuities in events from before to after the great day and 2) the reason for these untrue claims.
The official story is untrue. It's a coverup and the natural assumption, which I have every intention of making and proving, is that those engineering a cover up have something to hide. Something rather big. Certainly bigger than incompetence. Much bigger than shooting down Flight 93, which could easily have been spun as an act of toughness and defiance. Maybe even a sacrifice, to appeal to the unclean subconscious pagan/telluric realms of the public mind.
The coverup, truth be told, was inplace (as are all good coverups) long before the event to be covered up happened.
So this is how I'm going to approach it.
Firstly, we need to look at the political reasons behind it. 9/11 as catalysing event for foreign policy manipulation. Secondly, we need to look at the ritualistic aspects which are integral to both the reasons for the attack and the oddities about its execution. Thirdly, the physical evidence and fourthly the individuals directly responsible for the attack and the infrastructure that made in possible.
I don't accept a pre-historic goddess worshipping culture (although I think it's very probably the elites do, but their secret knowledge isn't necessarily correct). There is no reason, reasonable or otherwise, for the view of women as morally superior. It's not the natural state of man. In ancient Greece or seventeenth century England it would have been an unbelievable inversion of the natural order. Then it was realised that women are mentally and emotionally weak, easily led, the "doorway to the devil".
That, of course, is the reason for the engineering of the current situation by the elites, not just their well known goddess-worshipping ways but the ease of world-historic control through the female house-nigger class. From 1945 to 1979 every election would have been won by Labour were it not for the treacherous votes of women. Might not seem a very democratic idea, taking peoples votes away because they vote for the wrong people, but here we made need to consider it.
Fascism especially, often described as a male-dominance cult enforcing some kind of "male values" on the world is quite the opposite. The shrill and unreasonable attitudes and the conformist nature of the fascist are innately female characteristics.
Hitler depended entirely upon his bizarre and inexpicable appeal to women. It's always the women of the white feather brigade who get the wars going, never on their own initiative any more than a flock of sheep moves on its own initiative but they're kindly pointed in the direction of their enemy by the shepherds of the people.
Governing humans is essentially livestock management.
-- Catherine Austin Fitts
You could call fascism a male dominance cult, but it's a cult dominated by the "values" of women, the strict observance of convention and popular mores, the obedience to authority. The knee high leather boots. Of course there is always an elite of men at the very top, controlling the women as their was once a white class controlling the house niggers who collaborated against their fellow black fellows. But the blacks out in the fields, to continue our metaphor, are men.
I will quote from the captured correspondences of the Illuminati of Bavaria now, that august order who so great plans for the infiltration of publishing and the courts of kings and the subversion of masonry seem, judging by results, not to have been harmed by the official dissolution of the order:
We cannot improve the world without improving women, who have such a mighty influence on the men. But how shall we get hold of them? How will their relations, particularly their mothers, immersed in prejudice, consent that others shall influence their education? We must begin with grown girls. Hercules proposes the wife of Ptolemy Magus. I have no objection, and I have four step-daughters, fine girls. The oldest in particular is excellent. She is twenty-four, has read much, is above all prejudices, and in religion she thinks as I do.It may immediately be a very pretty Society, under the management of Ptolemy's wife, but really under his management. You must contrive pretty degrees and dresses, and ornaments, and elegant and decent rituals. No man must be admitted. This will make them become more keen, and they will go much farther than if we were present, or than if they thought that we knew of their preceedings. Leave them to the scope of their own fancies, and they will soon invent mysteries which will put us to the blush, and create an enthusiasm which we can never equal. They will be our great apostles. Reflect on the respect, nay the awe and terror inspired by the female mystics of antiquity. (Think of the Danaids--think of the Theban Bacchantes.) Ptolemy's wife must direct them, and she will be instructed by Ptolemy, and my step-daughters will consult with me. We must always be at hand to prevent the introduction of any improper question. We must prepare themes for their discussion--thus we shall confess them, and inspire them with our sentiments. No man however must come near them. This will fire their roving fancies and we may expect rare mysteries.
Rare mysteries, no doubt, of the sex-magickal variety!
You see how they recognised that women must be managed in a shallow manner, pretty dresses for the degrees and so forth and how they may be led to pathological and hysterical enthusiasms.
See also how they must be kept in line, on a tight leash as they say, while thinking they are an independent association. So it is with feminism today, of course. I've heard it say that the CIA infiltrate everything, certainly they do so with a lot of things, but there is a fundamental difference between a COINTELPRO campaign of destabilisation of dissident orgranisations such as that of MLK, or even those useful old groups like the US Communist party in times past which got more money from the CIA agents sent to join than it did from legitimate members, and what's happened with feminism.
Feminism is not an organisation infiltrated by the CIA to destabilise it, rather its main propaganda organ Ms Magazine was set up by the CIA, as has been admitted by its founding editor (herself an agent provocateur against Socialist youth meetings). That same founding editor was one of the founding members of the movement and is to this day one of its most widely read and respected philiosophers.
Feminism wasn't destabilised by the elites, it was planted and tended by them. It was created by them. The Mason/Illuminati behind the French revolution first got it planted and their paraphysical allies got involved at Seneca Falls and with the "devil-woman" who was running for president. Spiritualism and feminism. And Quakerism and other devout Christian sects. It was fundamentalists who brainwashed Sirhan Sirhan. Underwager was once a baptist priest. So was, I think, Dutroux.
Wednesday, 7 May 2008
Summer is coming and the scum are out of the streets. Tattoos exposed. Half naked twelve year old boys in the streets with crates of Old Wifebeater on their shoulders, always the drink of non-champions.
I've seen a picture. It has too odd looking men in archaic costume, it's a drawing. They are in an odd pose, the one on the left has his left hand on the right shoulder of the one on the right. The one on the right has his right arm behind his back, three fingers of his left hand in the collar of the other man and his feet Egyptian style. The top of the picture has writing of a type with which I'm not familiar. Some Latin letters, others symbols I'm not familiar with.
Friday, 2 May 2008
BBC banned from Vatican property because it showed "unnecessary vigour" on paedo priests. So, no doubt, did they.