I don't accept a pre-historic goddess worshipping culture (although I think it's very probably the elites do, but their secret knowledge isn't necessarily correct). There is no reason, reasonable or otherwise, for the view of women as morally superior. It's not the natural state of man. In ancient Greece or seventeenth century England it would have been an unbelievable inversion of the natural order. Then it was realised that women are mentally and emotionally weak, easily led, the "doorway to the devil".
That, of course, is the reason for the engineering of the current situation by the elites, not just their well known goddess-worshipping ways but the ease of world-historic control through the female house-nigger class. From 1945 to 1979 every election would have been won by Labour were it not for the treacherous votes of women. Might not seem a very democratic idea, taking peoples votes away because they vote for the wrong people, but here we made need to consider it.
Fascism especially, often described as a male-dominance cult enforcing some kind of "male values" on the world is quite the opposite. The shrill and unreasonable attitudes and the conformist nature of the fascist are innately female characteristics.
Hitler depended entirely upon his bizarre and inexpicable appeal to women. It's always the women of the white feather brigade who get the wars going, never on their own initiative any more than a flock of sheep moves on its own initiative but they're kindly pointed in the direction of their enemy by the shepherds of the people.
Governing humans is essentially livestock management.
-- Catherine Austin Fitts
You could call fascism a male dominance cult, but it's a cult dominated by the "values" of women, the strict observance of convention and popular mores, the obedience to authority. The knee high leather boots. Of course there is always an elite of men at the very top, controlling the women as their was once a white class controlling the house niggers who collaborated against their fellow black fellows. But the blacks out in the fields, to continue our metaphor, are men.
I will quote from the captured correspondences of the Illuminati of Bavaria now, that august order who so great plans for the infiltration of publishing and the courts of kings and the subversion of masonry seem, judging by results, not to have been harmed by the official dissolution of the order:
We cannot improve the world without improving women, who have such a mighty influence on the men. But how shall we get hold of them? How will their relations, particularly their mothers, immersed in prejudice, consent that others shall influence their education? We must begin with grown girls. Hercules proposes the wife of Ptolemy Magus. I have no objection, and I have four step-daughters, fine girls. The oldest in particular is excellent. She is twenty-four, has read much, is above all prejudices, and in religion she thinks as I do.It may immediately be a very pretty Society, under the management of Ptolemy's wife, but really under his management. You must contrive pretty degrees and dresses, and ornaments, and elegant and decent rituals. No man must be admitted. This will make them become more keen, and they will go much farther than if we were present, or than if they thought that we knew of their preceedings. Leave them to the scope of their own fancies, and they will soon invent mysteries which will put us to the blush, and create an enthusiasm which we can never equal. They will be our great apostles. Reflect on the respect, nay the awe and terror inspired by the female mystics of antiquity. (Think of the Danaids--think of the Theban Bacchantes.) Ptolemy's wife must direct them, and she will be instructed by Ptolemy, and my step-daughters will consult with me. We must always be at hand to prevent the introduction of any improper question. We must prepare themes for their discussion--thus we shall confess them, and inspire them with our sentiments. No man however must come near them. This will fire their roving fancies and we may expect rare mysteries.
Rare mysteries, no doubt, of the sex-magickal variety!
You see how they recognised that women must be managed in a shallow manner, pretty dresses for the degrees and so forth and how they may be led to pathological and hysterical enthusiasms.
See also how they must be kept in line, on a tight leash as they say, while thinking they are an independent association. So it is with feminism today, of course. I've heard it say that the CIA infiltrate everything, certainly they do so with a lot of things, but there is a fundamental difference between a COINTELPRO campaign of destabilisation of dissident orgranisations such as that of MLK, or even those useful old groups like the US Communist party in times past which got more money from the CIA agents sent to join than it did from legitimate members, and what's happened with feminism.
Feminism is not an organisation infiltrated by the CIA to destabilise it, rather its main propaganda organ Ms Magazine was set up by the CIA, as has been admitted by its founding editor (herself an agent provocateur against Socialist youth meetings). That same founding editor was one of the founding members of the movement and is to this day one of its most widely read and respected philiosophers.
Feminism wasn't destabilised by the elites, it was planted and tended by them. It was created by them. The Mason/Illuminati behind the French revolution first got it planted and their paraphysical allies got involved at Seneca Falls and with the "devil-woman" who was running for president. Spiritualism and feminism. And Quakerism and other devout Christian sects. It was fundamentalists who brainwashed Sirhan Sirhan. Underwager was once a baptist priest. So was, I think, Dutroux.
No comments:
Post a Comment